Subject	Interesting read! Very informative. (n/m)
Posted by	lewoolf2 on April 01, 2005 at 1:27 AM
	This message has been viewed 16 times.
In Reply To	Bigger does not (necessarilly) equal better on an posted by SirpriZ on April 01, 2005 at 01:10 AM
Message
Follow Ups	Clairification of previous post... (re: SMIC's) - Tyler@Boostpro.net 00:35:35 04/01/05 well.... - Ash's Z 01:04:35 04/01/05 Very wise approach, I look forward to your numbers... - SirpriZ 01:14:26 04/01/05 exactly how i would do it too - yellowzxtt 08:21:07 04/01/05 Bigger does not (necessarilly) equal better on an - SirpriZ 01:10:04 04/01/05 thats a good read. (n/m) - Tyler@Boostpro.net 01:12:06 04/01/05 You mean I didn't discover it? Yeah, I found it to be - SirpriZ 01:15:50 04/01/05 Interesting read! Very informative. (n/m) - lewoolf2 01:27:38 04/01/05 yep - aliaZ 07:41:05 04/01/05 well theory aside - i belive in testing - yellowzxtt 08:20:14 04/01/05 interesting what bell says but they contradict themselves - yellowzxtt 08:35:49 04/01/05 read this>>> - yellowzxtt 09:21:24 04/01/05 you're misreading their charts - aliaZ 11:03:08 04/01/05 read - how i wrote it - yellowzxtt 20:28:33 04/01/05 no, you're not - aliaZ 20:49:28 04/01/05 You do realize that applications do exist where pressure - SeedyROM 10:57:49 04/01/05 yes i Do know that >>> - yellowzxtt 20:32:51 04/01/05 I believe your point is incorrect - aliaZ 21:02:29 04/01/05 ok we will see when i test (n/m) - yellowzxtt 04:13:51 04/02/05 I look forward to your results. thanks (n/m) - aliaZ 09:28:14 04/02/05 just curious... - aliaZ 09:50:34 04/02/05 >>> - yellowzxtt 04:18:14 04/02/05 Re: >>> - aliaZ 09:25:42 04/02/05 I thought everyone knew the Greddys flowed more? BUT... - SeedyROM 04:25:08 04/02/05 yep... - aliaZ 09:36:07 04/02/05 >>> - yellowzxtt 20:38:10 04/01/05 why don't you test first, and then make your argument - aliaZ 20:52:04 04/01/05
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.